Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
Jan 20, 2013 2:00am EST
rightful place and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its costs. we'll harness harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. and we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. all this we can do. all this we will do. now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. their memories are short. they have forgotten what this country has already done, what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose and necessity to courage. what the cynics that to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them, that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. the question we have today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works, whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. whether the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. where the answer is
Jan 19, 2013 7:00pm EST
this question? how much blood has to be taken in order to test for blood alcohol? what if medical technology advances to -- i gather it's a -- it's a substantial amount. but what if it advances to the point that you don't need any more blood than you need now to test blood sugar, and you just have a little machine that makes a tiny prick in somebody's finger and you've got enough blood to do a blood alcohol test. does it change then? mr. shapiro: i don't -- excuse me -- i don't think the fourth amendment rule turns on the amount of blood that you take out of somebody's body. think the fourth -- an important, maybe not the important dividing line, an important dividing line for fourth amendment purposes is puncturing the skin, and the court has recognized this in other circumstances. and i think -- chief justice roberts: so does that mean -the last footnote in the solicitor general's brief talks about some other methods, including a urine sample. not as accurate as blood, but it can help achieve the same result. one of the things that i think affects the view in this case is it's a pretty sca
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2